Institute Report
Unlocking Biosimilar Potential
Ophthalmology Case Study
Feb 05, 2026

Report Summary:

Ensuring that challenges to biosimilar uptake are continuously assessed and addressed is a critical part of unlocking their benefits. Biosimilar use is growing across therapy areas with different specialties gaining experience and confidence. These biosimilars have also provided substantial savings for the overall health system. Between 2023 and 2025, IQVIA Institute has published two reports highlighting the importance of physician perspectives on biosimilars for their optimal use, especially in therapy areas where overall experience with biosimilars has been limited. While certain challenges to the uptake of biosimilars are common across therapy areas, each new area provides some unique dynamics. Assessment of these dynamics can allow stakeholders to work together and ensure that optimal benefits are achieved.

This report presents a case study of ophthalmology which saw the recent entry of aflibercept biosimilars in 2025. Ophthalmology had also seen the entry of ranibizumab biosimilars in 2022, however, the uptake of the biosimilar was limited. With aflibercept biosimilars entering this therapeutic area with the potential to reduce costs substantially, there is a need to assess challenges that they might face. The degree of familiarity and prior experience with biosimilars is likely to be highly variable for stakeholders in the ophthalmology space given the prior experience with ranibizumab.

This report provides a summary of the overall context for ophthalmology and a set of interviews with key stakeholders, including physicians, payers, and nurses who are involved in the treatment and management of ophthalmology. The report aims to understand the current state of knowledge about biosimilars across stakeholders and potential barriers to optimal biosimilar use from a physician perspective in this therapy area.

The report utilizes the interviews to highlight some possible solutions to overcome challenges regarding the variable level of knowledge and experience with biosimilars along with other structural challenges.

Key Findings:

  • Biosimilars generate savings for the healthcare system and can expand access to biologics. Despite representing only 5% of biologics spending in 2024, biosimilars have already contributed €75 billion in cumulative list-price savings in Europe and enabled over 7 billion treatment days.
  • Ophthalmology represents a high-burden therapy area with a rapidly growing patient population driven by aging demographics. Retinal diseases—including wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO)—are leading causes of visual impairment and blindness.
  • Ophthalmology systems across Europe face capacity constraints—stemming from clinician shortages, increasing demand, and limited clinic infrastructure—which lengthen waiting times and risk avoidable vision loss due to delayed care. Evidence suggests that lapses in anti-VEGF treatment can lead to irreversible deterioration in visual outcomes. Since biosimilars can generate significant cost savings, their adoption could play an important role in alleviating ophthalmology capacity pressures.
  • To understand these challenges, 142 in-depth interviews with ophthalmologists, retina specialists, nurses, pharmacists, payers, and patient advocacy representatives across five European countries were conducted in Q1 2025. Findings reveal low overall confidence and limited use of biosimilars in ophthalmology. Confidence scores ranged from 2/7 in France, Germany, and Spain to 5.5/7 in the UK. A similar pattern was observed for actual use. Lack of familiarity with biosimilars, concerns about comparability, and insufficient exposure to clinical evidence emerged as recurring themes.
  • The report identifies several systemic barriers based on stakeholder input. First, limited stakeholder experience and education undermine clinician confidence. Ophthalmologists’ prescribing habits can be conservative due to the precision and risk associated with intravitreal therapy. Second, prior experience with biosimilars—particularly the lack of a PFS option for ranibizumab biosimilars—has impacted perceptions of biosimilars. Third, fragmented and slow decision-making processes across national, regional, and institutional levels delay biosimilar access.
Contact Us