Over the past two decades advances in targeted immunotherapy have transformed the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases by blocking pro-inflammatory signalling pathways.
Therapies targeting inflammatory cytokines, e.g., TNF-α, IL-4, IL-13, IL-17 or IL-23; B-cells and T-cells, and intracellular kinases, e.g., JAK, have become the standard of care for patients with moderate-to-severe disease in many immunology indications, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease or atopic dermatitis, among other conditions.
Biologics, administered intravenously or as a sub-cutaneous injection, dominate the segment of targeted, systemic therapies across major immunology indications and include past and current mega-blockbuster brands, such as Humira, Stelara and Dupixent. Meanwhile, targeted oral therapies have achieved a more modest share of treated patients to date (see Figure 1).
Marketed oral targeted therapies utilise four mechanisms of action (MoAs) that target inflammatory pathways via modulation of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4), Janus kinases (JAKs), tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) or sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P). Importantly, each of these MoAs is approved for specific immunology indication(s), not across all of immunology, with JAK inhibitors proving the most versatile.
Despite offering patients the convenience of a pill, current oral targeted immunotherapies have a number of limitations that affect their adoption, for example:
Therefore, the ultimate aspiration of reconciling superior, biologic-like efficacy and safety with the convenience of an oral formulation still remains unfulfilled. This creates an opportunity for innovators to develop novel oral therapies with differentiated profiles to address unmet need and expand the use of orals in immunology.
In the development of novel oral immunotherapies we see innovators pursue three distinct strategies:
The mid-/late-stage pipeline for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) shows these three strategies at work (see Figure 2), and we should expect the oral treatment landscape in IBD to expand significantly over the next few years.
Delivering biologic-like efficacy is the foundational prerequisite for targeted oral immunotherapies to be successful in the segment of patients with moderate-to-severe disease, including both as potential first-line advanced therapy options and in second-line, e.g., in refractory patients or in a maintenance therapy setting.
Recent innovation trends in psoriasis, for example, illustrate that novel oral therapies are narrowing the efficacy gap vs. standard of care biologics, which keep pushing the efficacy frontier, with PASI 100, i.e., full skin clearance, now the benchmark to beat (see Figure 3).
The much anticipated, recent readouts from several phase 3 trials suggest J&J’s oral IL-23 receptor inhibitor icotrokinra has best-in-class potential among novel oral therapies, with efficacy approaching that of biologics:
Following these positive readouts, J&J announced the initiation of ICONIC-ASCEND, a head-to-head phase 3 study of icotrokinra vs. J&J’s own injectable, IL-12/23 inhibitor Stelara in plaque psoriasis. This trial represents a first and is the ultimate test for demonstrating biologic-like efficacy, as it seeks to prove that an oral therapy can outperform an injectable biologic in psoriasis in a direct, head-to-head comparison.
While icotrokinra benefits from the strong safety track record of the IL-23 MoA, it still needs to generate its own long-term safety data to establish itself as a safe and potent oral therapy option.
Beyond autoimmune diseases, oral targeted therapies are also aiming to make inroads in inflammation indications. To date, several oral JAK inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, e.g., Olumiant, Cibinqo and Rinvoq.
Examples of current innovation efforts targeted at inflammation that seek to reshape the biologics-dominated advanced therapy landscape include oral S1P inhibitor Velsipity, which is being investigated in a phase 2 trial in eosinophilic esophagitis; oral IRAK4 degrader SAR444656 in phase 2 for atopic dermatitis; and oral BTK inhibitors for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), including rilzabrutinib in phase 2, and remibrutinib which in its REMIX-1 and REMIX-2 phase 3 trials proved itself as a potential, potent oral CSU therapy with fast onset of action.
Market expansion is critical for oral targeted immunotherapies to fulfil their promise. Today, many patients who are eligible for a targeted therapy do not receive one. For example, treatment rates of targeted therapy eligible patients are around 50% in Crohn’s disease, less than 40% for psoriasis and as low as 10-15% in atopic dermatitis.
Therefore, helped by the greater convenience of their route of administration, oral targeted therapies have a tremendous opportunity to increase market penetration of advanced therapies by expanding use into eligible but targeted therapy naïve patient segments, who currently are sub-optimally treated, e.g., with corticosteroids.
As novel oral therapies embark on seizing the commercial opportunity, they will face a number of challenges:
To succeed in the fiercely competitive immunology market, innovators must focus on three strategic priorities:
This is a promising time for immunology patients as many novel oral immunotherapies advance through the pipeline to deliver on the aspiration of combining biologic-like potency, safety and the convenience of a pill.