In our Integrated Evidence Generation blog series, we have embarked on a journey to revisit the basics and uncover the frameworks that enable transformational use of evidence. This 5-part series explores what IEG is, who the stakeholders are, why it is required, when it should be developed, and how it is achieved.
In the first article, “WHAT is IEG in the Context of APAC”, we explored the definition of IEG, the different components that support regulatory and reimbursement decision-making and provided an overview of our IQVIA IEG framework. The second article, focused on ‘Who’, will delve deeper into the roles, evidence requirements and value demands by each stakeholder across the healthcare continuum.
An Integrated Evidence Generation (IEG) plan serves as a central nexus, designed to meet the unique expectations and deliver tangible value to each critical stakeholder in the healthcare ecosystem. By fostering a data-driven environment, IEG ensures that innovation translates into meaningful impact for all. But who exactly are the stakeholders we consider when developing an IEG strategy?
In our strategy, we focus on 5 key stakeholder groups: Providers, Patients, Pharma, Payers and Regulatory Bodies. Let’s take a closer look at each, with a focus on the unique demands of the Asia Pacific (APAC) region.The IEG must be fundamentally designed around patients, with a focus on improving healthcare outcomes. In the diverse APAC region, this requires sensitivity to varying cultural beliefs, languages and levels of health literacy while ensuring equitable access to innovation.
IEG empowers HCPs with robust, actionable data to deliver high-quality care. In APAC, this means ensuring evidence that is relevant to the local demographics.
IEG streamlines critical processes for pharmaceutical companies and regulatory authorities, accelerating innovation while ensuring compliance and value. In APAC, this means navigating a fragmented market with distinct regulatory environments and diverse patient populations.
IEG addresses the core concerns of payers by providing evidence necessary for informed reimbursement decisions and market access. In APAC, this includes national health insurance schemes, private insurers and out-of-pocket payment systems.
By meeting the expectations of all these critical stakeholders, the IEG serves as a robust framework for building and communicating value, ultimately advancing healthcare for the benefit of all in the APAC region.
For more information on evidence planning and medical affairs solutions, contact us.
In Article 3, we will explore why an APAC-specific IEG strategy is necessary, how it differs from the Global IEG strategy, and what key questions should be considered when developing a Regional IEG strategy. The article will also highlight how IEG can support regulatory and reimbursement decision-making.
To understand the IQVIA IEG framework, read our first article of the series, “WHAT is IEG in the Context of APAC”.